การปรับตัวและต่อรองของชุมชนผ่านโครงการลดผลกระทบจากการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ ในจังหวัดเชียงใหม่ ADAPTATION AND NEGOTIATION OF COMMUNITIES THROUGH CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION PROJECT IN CHIAN MAI

Main Article Content

Arratee Ayuttacorn อารตี อยุทธคร

Abstract

This qualitative research aimed to study the adaptation and negotiation of communities for the right to “the use of land” through the government’s natural resource management under the Climate Change Impact Mitigation Project. The researcher used the concept of the power of obstruction to explain the mechanism of the government’s administration and control of natural resource management in particular land and community lifestyle. The research investigated three case studies in Chiang Mai namely case of forest reclamation at Ban Lao Wu, Mae Chaem Model Project, and REDD Plus Project at Ban Mueang Ang. The research was conducted between June 2017 - May 2018 through data compilation using the participant observation technique and in-depth interviews with villagers, community leaders, local administrative organizations, government agencies, and private development organizations. The research findings presented that the government operated these projects by using the discourse of global warming to establish the legitimacy of natural resource management, forest reclamation policy at Ban Lao Wu, Wiang Haeng district, and Mae Chaem Model Project at Ban Mae Khimuk. As a result, the communities returned their livelihood land to the government which led to the change in land use. The villagers shifted corn cultivations to fruit trees and integrated farming. As for REDD Plus Project at Ban Mueang Ang, it did not cause the change of the villagers’ lifestyle as the villagers were earlier developed by royal-initiated projects with sustainable land use. However, the community was not aware of benefit-sharing from the REDD Plus Project.

Keywords

Article Details

How to Cite
อารตี อยุทธครA. A. (2018). การปรับตัวและต่อรองของชุมชนผ่านโครงการลดผลกระทบจากการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ ในจังหวัดเชียงใหม่ ADAPTATION AND NEGOTIATION OF COMMUNITIES THROUGH CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION PROJECT IN CHIAN MAI. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14456/jem.2018.9
Section
บทความวิจัย Research

References

1. Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5(2), 147-183.

2. Agrawal, A. (2010). Social Dimensions of Climate Change: Equity and Vulnerability in a Warming World. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

3. Baird, I. G. (2014). Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and access and exclusion: Obstacles and opportunities in Cambodia and Laos. Southeast Asian Studies, 3(3), 643-668.

4. Benjaminsen, T. A., & Bryceson, I. (2012). Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 335-355.

5. Chiangthong, J. (2013). State, Capital, Border Merchant, Farmer, and Transborder Corn [In Thai], Chiang Mai: Wanida Press.

6. Corson, C., & MacDonald, K. I. (2012). Enclosing the global commons: the convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 263-283.

7. [DNP] Department of National Park. (2014). Master Plan for Forest Protection [In thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://www.dnp.go.th/info_protect/master plan/master plan for national forest protection.pdf

8. Devine, J. A. (2018). Community forest concessionaires: resisting green grabs and producing political subjects in Guatemala. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(3), 565-584.

9. Dwyer, M. B. (2015). The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(5), 903-928.

10. Dwyer, M. B., & Ingalls, M. (2015). REDD+ at the Crossroads: Choices and Tradeoffs for 2015–2020 in Laos. Indonesia, Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.

11. Ferguson, J.M. (2014). The scramble for the Waste Lands: Tracking colonial legacies, counterinsurgency and international investment through the lens of land laws in Burma/Myanmar. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35(3), 295-311.

12. Forsyth, T. & Walker, A. (2008). Forest guardians, forest destroyers: the politics of environmental knowledge in northern Thailand. Seattle, WA and London, UK: University of Washington Press.

13. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

14. Green, K. E., & Adams, W. M. (2015). Green grabbing and the dynamics of local-level engagement with neoliberalization in Tanzania’s wildlife management areas. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(1), 97-117.

15. Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2011). Powers of exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore and Honolulu: NUS Press and University of Hawaii Press.

16. Hirsch, P. (1993). Political economy of environment in Thailand. Manila: Journal of Contemporary Asia Publishers.

17. Johnson, C., & Forsyth, T. (2002). In the eyes of the state: Negotiating a “rights-based approach” to forest conservation in Thailand. World development, 30(9), 1591-1605.

18. Khusantea, A. (2014). Global Warming Master Plan and Villagers eviction from the forest [In thai]. The Nation Weekend, 1178.

19. Leblond, J.P., & Pham, T. H. (2014). Recent forest expansion in Thailand: a methodological artifact?. Journal of Land Use Science, 9(2), 211-241.

20. Li, T.M. (1999). Transforming the Indonesian uplands. Singapore: ISEAS

21. Lukkanaworakul, R. (2015). Climate Change and REDD+[In thai], Learning set of Global warming Redd Plus and Forest Environment No. 1, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation.

22. [NDF] Northern Development Foundation, Baan Klang & Mae Om-gi communities. (2012). Mode of production in agroforestry systems, rotational farming, community forest management and climate change, and food security of small farmers in high land : the case study of Baan Klang, Mae Muae district, Lumpang and Bann Mae Om-gi, Tha Song Yang district, Tak [In thai]. Oxfam Great Britain(Thailand) and Rockefeller Foundation.

23. [NDF] Northern Development Foundation & Hauy Hin Lard community. (2012). Mode of production in afroforestry systems and community forest management and climate change, and food security of Karen community in Northern Thailand [In Thai]. Oxfam Great Britain(Thailand).

24. Office of Climate Change in the Forestry Sector. (2018). Pilot Activities for Community Development in Sustainable Forest Management and increasing Carbon Stock in the Forest [In Thai]. Retrieved May 19, 2018, from https://reddplus.dnp.go.th/pilot activity for delelop implementation/

25. Office of Policy and Planning for Natural Resources and Environmental. (2015). Master Plan for Climate Change 2015-2050 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment [In Thai]. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from https://www.onep.go.th/topics/book/master plan for climate change

26. Ojeda, D. (2012). Green pretexts: Ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 357-375.

27. Peluso, N. L. (1992). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.

28. Pongboonjun, s. (2018). Rule by Law[InThai] Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://prachatai.com/ journal/2018/02/75535

29. Prachatai. (2018). Rule by Law and Reforestation Policy of National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) [In Thai]. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://prachatai.com/journal/2018/02/75535

30. Puan-Udom, T. (2016). Dreaming District-Mae Chaem Model Plus [In Thai]. CMUSR Magazine, 4(3), p.3.

31. Pye, O. (2005). Khor jor kor: Forest politics in Thailand. Bangkok: White Lotus.

32. [RFD] Royal Forest Department. (1998). Forestry Statistics in Thailand [In Thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://forestinfo.forest.go.th/55/Content.aspx?id=160

33. [RFD] Royal Forest Department. (2017a). Forestry Statistics in Thailand [In Thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://forestinfo.forest.go.th/55/Content.aspx?id=10349

34. Roberts, K. (2016). It takes a rooted village: Networked resistance, connected communities, and adap- tive responses to forest tenure reform in northern Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(1), 53-68.

35. Rocheleau, D. E. (2015). Networked, rooted and territorial: Green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3-4), 695-723.

36. Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2014a). Royal Thai Government Gazette Vol. 131, Special Issue 115 d, June 20, 2014 Page 3 Order 64/2557 [In Thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://www.forest.go.th/forestprotect_operation/images/stories/file/002-NCPO/001-64-2557.pdf

37. Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2014b). Royal Thai Government Gazette Vol. 131, Special Issue 120 d, June 27, 2014 Page 1 Order 66/2557 [In Thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://www.forest.go.th/forestprotect_operation/images/stories/file/002-NCPO/002-66-2557.pdf

38. Santasombat, Y. (2004). Ethno-ecology, Biodiversity and Community Rights [In Thai]. Faculty of Social Sciences: Chiang Mai University.

39. Schoenberger, L., Hall, D., & Vandergeest, P. (2017). What happened when the land grab came to Southeast Asia?. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 697-725.

40. Sustainable Development Foundation. (2016). The Solution: “Mae-Chaem Model”, the drive cooperation,
Forest Restoration for sustainable development [In Thai]. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://www.cp-enews.com/news/details/cpcsr/1941

41. Taylor, C. (2013). The Discourses of Climate Change. In Cadman, T. (Ed.), Climate Change and Global Policy Regimes: Towards Institutional Legitimacy (pp. 17-31). Hampshire: Palgrave macmillan.

42. Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization. (2015). Implementation of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions: NAMAs [In Thai]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from www.tgo.or.th

43. Thaipublica. (2016). Smog, Forest fire, Drought and Difficult Cases of Mae-Chaem Model [In Thai]. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from https://thaipublica.org/2016/04/smog-cp/

44. The Center for People and Forests. (2016). What is REDD+ [In Thai]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.recoftc.org/node/16036

45. The momentum. (2018). Reforestation Policy and Authoritarian Reflection [In Thai]. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://today.line.me/th/pc/article/policy +‘forest restoration’+and reflection+‘authoritarian’-XEM82k

46. Transborder News. (2014). Love the Forest, Don’t Forget people: the Voice from Highland People [In Thai]. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://transbordernews.in.th/home/?p=5828

47. Vandergeest, P. (1996). Mapping nature: Territorialization of forest rights in Thailand. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 9(2), 159-175.

48. Vandergeest, P. (2003). Racialization and citizenship in Thai forest politics. Society &Natural Resources, 16(1), 19-37.

49. Walker, A., & Farrelly, N. (2008). Northern Thailand’s Specter of Eviction. Critical Asian Studies, 40(3), 373-397.

50. Woods, K., Barney, K., & Canby, K. (2011). Baseline Study 5, Thailand: Overview of Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade. Kuala Lumper: Forest Trends for FLEGT Asia Regional Programme.