Influence of emotional regulation on successful aging among Thai older adults

  • Arunya Tuicomepee
  • Panrapee Panrapee Suttiwan
  • Rewadee Watakakosol
  • Sakkaphat T. Ngamake
  • Sompoch Iamsupasit


Purpose – Successful aging represents a positive development in older adults. The emphasis on aging well has sought to understand resources such as emotional regulation that facilitates healthy and happy aging. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of two common emotional regulation strategies (i.e. cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression) on successful aging among Thai older adults.

Design/methodology/approach – The participants selected for this paper were 150 older adults living in Bangkok and adjacent areas. Their mean age was 69.7 (±6.7) years old. Instruments were the Successful Aging Inventory and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Each participant voluntarily completed an
individual self -reported questionnaire. 

Findings – The results revealed that the two emotional regulation strategies (cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression) have collectively explained 6 percent of the variance of successful aging. The cognitive reappraisal strategy was a sole significant predictor ( β=0.20). 

Originality/value – Promoting emotional regulation strategies in particular a cognitive reappraisal strategy among Thai older adults can facilitate their cognitive functioning, and their successful aging.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Human aging: usual and successful. Science. 1987; 237(4811): 143-9.
2. Thanakwang K, Soonthorndhada K, Mongkolprasoet J. Perspectives on healthy aging among Thai elderly: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2012; 14(4): 472-9.
3. Thiamwong L, McManus MS, Suwanno J. Development of the Thai healthy aging model: a grounded theory study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15(2): 256-61.
4. Watakakosol R, Ngamake S, Suttiwan P, Tuicomepee A, Lawpoonpat C, Iamsupasit S. Factors related to successful aging in Thai elderly: a preliminary study. J Health Res. 2013; 27(1): 51-6.
5. Gross JJ, John X. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2): 348-62.
6. Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. 2007; The Guildford Press, New York, NY.
7. Matsumoto D, Yoo SH and Nakagawa S. Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(6): 925-37.
8. Carstensen LL, Gross J, Fung H. The social context of emotional experience. In: Lawton MP, Schaie KW editors. Annual review of geriatrics and gerontology. New York: Springer; 1997; 325-52.
9. Kelley K, Maxwell ES. Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. Psychol Methods. 2003; 8(3): 305-21.
10. Wei M, Su JC, Carrera S, Shu-Ping L. Suppression and interpersonal harmony: a cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and European Americans. J Couns Psychol. 2013; 60(4): 625-33.
11. Tori C, Bilmes M. Multiculturalism and psychoanalytic psychology: the validation of a defense mechanisms measure in an Asian population. Psychoanal Psychol. 2002; 19(4): 701-21.
How to Cite
Tuicomepee, A., Panrapee Suttiwan, P., Watakakosol, R., Ngamake, S., & Iamsupasit, S. (2018). Influence of emotional regulation on successful aging among Thai older adults. Journal of Health Research, 32(3), 198-202. Retrieved from